10 MONTEREY COUNTY WEEKLY AUGUST 21-27, 2025 www.montereycountynow.com NEWS There are a handful of animals in California synonymous with conservation efforts. Among them are condors, a beloved scavenger and one of the world’s rarest birds. Once brought to the brink of extinction partly due to lead poisoning from eating carcasses containing bullet fragments, condors are now protected through regulations requiring hunters and ranchers to use non-lead ammunition. Mike Stake, a senior wildlife biologist with the Ventana Wildlife Society, says hunters are the solution. “Their ability to follow the law is complicated by the availability of the ammunition,” he explains. “They want to see non-lead available in the store, that will be a big part of solving this problem.” In July, Kevin Kreyenhagen, chair of the Monterey County Fish and Game Advisory Commission, sent a letter to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and others seeking support to address the shortage of non-lead .22 LR (long rifle) ammunition. Last year, the only two manufacturers on the market discontinued their products, making compliance difficult. The Ventana Wildlife Society has identified one reputable manufacturer of .22 LR cartridges, but at roughly a dollar per round, the price is too steep, says Kreyenhagen, especially for squirrel hunting, which often requires higher rounds of shooting. Kreyenhagen has not yet heard back from any of the state agencies. On Aug. 12, County Supervisor Chris Lopez joined in, writing to the State Fish and Game Commission in support of state action. “There might be still a couple boxes [of .22 LR non-lead ammo] on the shelf,” Kreyenhagen says, “but that’s going to be coming to an end.” Up in Arms Limited supply of non-lead ammunition is making it difficult to comply with state laws. By Katie Rodriguez In the end, it was 15 years of public input, research and tinkering that saved the County of Monterey’s short-term rental ordinance at the California Coastal Commission. A majority of commissioners on Aug. 13 said they were wary of denying or further tweaking an ordinance that the county and the public had collaborated on extensively, even though Commissioner Chris Lopez, also the chair of the county’s Board of Supervisors, opposed the ordinance. “The solution the county came up with really does appear to be a middle ground,” said Commission Chair Meagan Harmon, pointing to the “very robust public engagement process” as part of why she was voting in favor of certifying an amendment to the county’s local coastal plan to include the ordinance passed by the supervisors nearly a year ago. The commission voted 6-2, with Lopez and Commissioner Jose Preciado voting no. (Commissioner Ann Notthoff from Carmel Valley recused herself. Notthoff is chair of the LandWatch board of directors, which supported the ordinance.) Lopez suggested making changes to the ordinance before approval. He said he was concerned for families that may need the income the rentals bring and the high cost of obtaining the necessary permits and licensing. A coastal development permit review could run approximately $12,000. Lopez also said he worried that by limiting the number of vacation rentals it would hamper access to the coast, one of the main goals of the Coastal Commission. “I don’t know that I’m ready to vote ‘yes’ today,” Lopez said. “I’m worried about access for [this] valuable part of California.” Last September the Board of Supervisors voted 3-2 to approve the ordinance for inland unincorporated Monterey County, Lopez and Supervisor Luis Alejo against. They also voted on an intent to approve the ordinance in the coastal zone, pending Coastal Commission approval. The ordinance caps STRs at 4 percent of the housing stock in unincorporated areas and eliminates commercial vacation rentals in Big Sur and Carmel Highlands. (Commercial rentals are also banned inland in Carmel Valley.) Unlimited homestays—where the property owners are present in the home—are allowed, as are limited vacation rentals, whole-house rentals for up to 30 days, three times a year. The elimination of commercial rentals in Big Sur and Carmel Highlands became a sticking point for the Coastal Commission. Others pointed out there would still be homestays and limited rentals. An attorney for the Monterey County Vacation Rental Alliance, STR owners and others argued that commissioners would be abdicating their legal commitment to promote access, but those in favor of the ordinance pointed out that access included protecting housing for people who work along the coast. Commissioners acknowledged the ordinance wasn’t perfect, but said it was crafted by the local government and the public attempting to balance coastal access with housing needs. County planning staff are tentatively planning to bring the ordinance to the supervisors on Sept. 23. If adopted, the regulations would go into effect on Oct. 24. Unpermitted rentals would have two months from that date to either apply for permits or cease operations. Monterey County Board Chair Chris Lopez, at a past board meeting in Salinas. He was appointed to the California Coastal Commission in May. Local Control The Coastal Commission approves Monterey County’s vacation rental ordinance in a major win. By Pam Marino An X-ray photo depicts a lead .22 LR bullet ingested by a condor that died of lead toxicosis. Lead ammunition in carcasses left behind by hunters is the leading killer for condors. “It really does appear to be a middle ground.” DANIEL DREIFUSS VENTANA WILDLIFE SOCIETY
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjAzNjQ1NQ==