www.montereycountynow.com SEPTEMBER 5-11, 2024 MONTEREY COUNTY WEEKLY 17 weapons from a potentially dangerous person. Once the necessary paperwork is submitted to the court, a judge will review it and can issue a temporary GVRO until a scheduled hearing three weeks later. At the hearing, a judge can issue a GVRO for up to five years, or throw it out. If the court grants the request, the person is required to turn in their weapons to the police or sell them to a gun dealer within 24 hours. In a March 2024 newsletter, nearly 10 years after she introduced the bill, Skinner wrote that while there is much more to be done on gun violence, GVROs have been “proven to be effective, but have been underutilized. “A good place to start is to fully use the gun violence prevention tools we already have in place, especially GVROs,” she wrote. “They’ll make our communities safer. We know they work.” • • • Look no further than Monterey County when examining Skinner’s claim that GVROs have been underutilized. In June, the California Department of Justice’s Office of Gun Violence Prevention released a report on the state’s nine different types of protection orders that prevent people from owning firearms, such as for domestic violence and civil harassment. From 2020 to 2023, the number of GVROs issued per year in California increased by 118 percent, according to the report. But of the 8,988 GVROs issued statewide from 2016 to 2023, 44 percent were issued in just two of the state’s 58 counties, San Diego and Santa Clara. Of the total amount issued, only 2,071 were final orders that lasted between one to five years, while the rest were temporary, generally for three weeks. For the final GVROs issued per capita, or those that last for multiple years, Monterey County is listed at below the state average. (Neighboring counties of Santa Cruz and San Luis Obispo were ranked in the top 10.) For Monterey County, 57 GVROs were filed from 2016-2023. Only 16 of those were final orders. A review of Monterey County Superior Court records shows Monterey and Salinas police departments are the top two local agencies that have filed the most GVROs, with Monterey at nearly a dozen and Salinas close on its heels. • • • Monterey Police Lt. Jake Pinkas says getting a final GVRO granted depends on the situation. He points to one example of a case Monterey Police filed that wasn’t granted—during a conversation between two people, one of them threatened to shoot the other. The man being accused denied the claims, and a judge agreed there wasn’t enough evidence to grant the GVRO. Is it just an empty threat during a drunken fight at the bar, or are these threats part of a pattern of altercations between the same people? The latter case could be more persuasive for a judge, Pinkas says, especially if police can prove the accused are in possession of firearms in the first place. Pinkas believes that even if a final order is not granted, a temporary one, which is easier to obtain, is beneficial, even though it’s “not an end-all, be-all,” he says. “You could get a gun illegally tomorrow.” But “tomorrow” might be meaningful. “For us, it’s a valuable tool even if it is just those 10 days before the court proceeding,” he says. “Maybe that has changed the person’s mind. Anytime that we have a tool that we can use to potentially prevent violence, I think it makes it valuable.” A 2022 study from the Violence Prevention Research Program at UC Davis examined 201 cases from the first three years since the GVRO law went into effect. Fifty-eight cases involved threats of mass shootings, and almost 30 percent of all individuals subject to the restraining order had assault-type weapons. The study suggests that GVROs have been effective in preventing selfharm. Threats of suicide accounted for about 40 percent of the cases, and none were reported among the people subject to the orders. Opponents of red flag laws, meanwhile, question the effectiveness of the laws, pointing to think tank RAND Corporation’s survey that found inconclusive evidence to support claims that they have been successful in reducing violent crime. Some also say the laws are constitutionally suspect, and infringe on residents’ Second and 14th amendments rights of owning firearms and due process, respectively. In 2022, the conservative majority of the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that gun laws must align with “history and tradition.” That set off a flurry of lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of firearms restrictions, including red flag laws. But in June 2024, a Supreme Court ruling upheld a law that prevents domestic abusers from being in possession of guns, and by doing so, gun control advocates say red flag laws are safe. “A good place to start is to fully use the gun violence prevention tools we already have in place.” DANIEL DREIFUSS DANIEL DREIFUSS Above: A Salinas resident turned in an arsenal of 32 personal firearms when a temporary restraining order was issued against him in March. At a hearing in July, a judge ruled not to extend the order. Right: Monterey Lt. Jake Pinkas says it is hard to measure whether gun violence restraining orders are effective when it comes to preventing violence.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjAzNjQ1NQ==